Teacher and Student Perceptions of Limited Face-to-Face Learning (PTM) During the Covid-19 Pandemic Period Elementary Schools on the Outskirts of the Kahayan River Watershed SDN-1 Hanua Village, Pulang Pisau Regency

  • Revianti Coendraad Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Whendy Trissan Palangka Raya University
  • Topan Eka Putra Palangka Raya University
Keywords: Teacher, Face-to-face learning limited, Perception, Student

Abstract

Many students feel bored studying online due to the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic since March 2020 because they cannot interact directly with their teachers and friends. On March 30, 2021, 4 Ministerial Joint Decrees (SKB) were issued, namely the Minister of Education and Culture, Minister of Religion, Minister of Health and Minister of Home Affairs Number 03/KB/2021, Number 384 of 2021, Number HK.01.08/MENKES/4242/ 2021, Number 440-717 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Organizing Learning During the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Through this joint decision, the government encourages limited face-to-face learning (PTM) acceleration while still implementing strict health protocols. Since the publication of the Joint Decree of 4 ministers concerning Guidelines for Organizing Learning During the 2019 Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic, many schools have conducted face-to-face learning. A limited face-to-face learning process has been carried out from mid-July 2021 until now. Limited Face-to-Face Learning (PTM) was carried out in one of the elementary schools at SDN-1 in Hanua Village, which is located on the outskirts of the Kahayan River watershed, Pulang Pisau Regency. This school as a whole has 8 teachers and 33 students, which in the implementation of limited PTM are scheduled from the school. The type of research used is a descriptive qualitative research approach. The place where the research was carried out at the research subject was a source for obtaining information and information from the research desired in this study. The subjects were teachers and high school students at SDN-1 Hanua Village, Pulang Pisau Regency. From the results of observations and interviews with teachers and students, it was found that according to teachers' perceptions they strongly agreed with limited PTM during the pandemic because it was more effective in using direct learning methods and resources to students so that it was easier to coordinate learning in class than online because it is indeed a network in the village not smooth so that it becomes an obstacle to online meetings. Meanwhile, according to student perceptions, they stated that students were very happy with limited face-to-face meetings during the pandemic because they could interact with their friends and felt comfortable studying at school, conducting learning in question and answer classes and understanding better the lessons given by the teacher in class.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asrori, Mohammad. 2009. Psikologi Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima

Coenraad, R. (2021). Pengaruh Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Turunan Dan Integral Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan Universitas Palangka Raya Tahun 2020/2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang 12 (02), 185-195

Emzir, 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis Data, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Kemendikbud. (2021). No Title. Keputusan Bersama Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Menteri Agama, Menteri Kesehatan, Dan Menterti Dalam Negeri Tentang Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Di Masa Pandemi Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19).

Kosmawanti, C., & Coenraad, R. (2017). Implementation Of Cooperative Learning Model Using Type Of Number Head Together (NHT) On Material Of Specification And Concrete Characteristic, Ceramic, And Roof-Tile For Building Construction In Class Of Concrete Engineering Concentration SMK Negeri 1. PARENTAS: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 3(2), 78-89.

Miles & Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis (terjemahan). Jakarta : UI Press. 2007.

Novi Rosita Rahmawati, 2020. Analisis Pembelajaran Daring Saat Pandemi Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, Vol. 1 no. 2 Oktober

Rismalinda, 2010. Psikologi Kesehatan, Jakarta Timur : Cv Trans Info Media

Robbins, S.P. dan Judge, T.A. 2008. Perilaku Organisasi 12th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rusman. 2016 Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sabiq, A. F. (2020). Persepsi Orang Tua Siswa Tentang Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Pada Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19. Journal Of Islamic Education Research, 1(3), 179–189.

Slameto. 2015. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sovi Endah Nurhayati, dkk.2022. Persepsi Orang Tua, Guru, dan Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) Terbatas pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan:Edukatif, Universitas Pahlawan, Volume 4 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Halm 827 – 834

Sulton, Ilmu Pendidikan, Nora Media Enterprise, Kudus, 2011, hlm. 83

Susanti, M.M.I. 2019. “Perbedaan Persepsi Guru Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Lama Mengajar Tentang Kurikulum 2013”, Elementary Journal. 1(2), 12-21.

Thoha, Miftah. 2010. Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Walgito, Bimo. 2010. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Coendraad, R., Trissan, W. and Putra, T.E. 2022. Teacher and Student Perceptions of Limited Face-to-Face Learning (PTM) During the Covid-19 Pandemic Period Elementary Schools on the Outskirts of the Kahayan River Watershed SDN-1 Hanua Village, Pulang Pisau Regency. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 13, 2 (Dec. 2022), 224-234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v13i2.167.