Students’ Learning Behavior in an Illegal Gold Mining Environment: A Qualitative Study at SMP Negeri 3 Banama Tingang
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the learning behavior of students living in an illegal gold mining (IGM) environment in the Kahayan River Basin area, particularly at SMP Negeri 3 Banama Tingang. Illegal gold mining activities that have developed within the community not only affect social and economic conditions but also influence students’ behavior and educational orientation. This study employed a qualitative approach using a descriptive research design. The research informants consisted of 17 students, 5 parents, 5 teachers, and 5 community leaders selected through purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña model, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Data validity was tested through source triangulation and technique triangulation. The findings revealed that the illegal gold mining environment negatively affects students’ learning motivation, discipline, attendance rates, and learning concentration due to non-conducive environmental conditions. In addition, parental involvement in supporting children’s education remains relatively low because parents are more focused on mining activities. A social environment that prioritizes instant economic gains causes some students to perceive formal education as a secondary need. This study concludes that illegal gold mining activities in the Kahayan River Basin influence students’ learning behavior through social, economic, family, and community environmental factors.
Downloads
References
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Bungin, B. (2017). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Kencana.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Endraswara, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kebudayaan. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Geertz, C. (1992). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
Haviland, W. A. (2011). Antropologi. Erlangga.
Hidayat, A. (2021). Pengaruh lingkungan masyarakat tambang terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 8(2), 115–124.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Koentjaraningrat. (2015). Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rahmawati, D., & Suryadi, S. (2020). Kondisi sosial ekonomi keluarga dan pengaruhnya terhadap disiplin belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 45–53.
Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Kencana.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Knopf.
Slameto. (2015). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Rajawali Pers.
Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode Etnografi. Tiara Wacana.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sztompka, P. (2011). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Prenada Media Group.
Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine Publishing.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ardy Wiranata, Andi Bustan, Rinto Alexandro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Ⓒ Author

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-3651
