Development Of Digital Literacy Assessment Scale To Measure Student’s Digital Literacy

  • Anggi Ristiyana Puspita Sari Universitas Palangka Raya
  • Suandi Sidauruk Palangka Raya University
  • Ruli Meiliawati Palangka Raya University
  • Maya Erliza Anggraeni Palangka Raya University
Keywords: Aiken's V, digital literacy, information technology, instrument

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic requires lecturers to change learning strategies through online learning. The use of technology which has grown exponentially in the world of education requires students to be proficient in using technology in finding information as a source of knowledge. To be able to prepare competitively students in this 4.0 education era, an instrument is needed to find out to what extent students' digital literacy abilities are. This research is development research (R&D) which aims to develop a Digital Literacy Assessment Scale (DLAS) instrument to measure students' digital literacy skills. The procedure of this research includes determining the construct and specifications of the instrument, writing the items, and analyzing the items. Based on the results, the DLAS instrument has a total of 52 items consisting of 3 aspects including access to information (access), student involvement in academic activities (behavioral engagement), and socio-emotional (socio-emotional). The results of content validity carried out by 5 expert judgments showed that the DLAS instrument was proven to be content valid with the acquisition of Aiken's V index of 0.87.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Aiken, L. . (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing: The reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131–142.

Atsani, L. G. M. Z. (2020). Transformasi media pembelajaran pada masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(1), 82–93. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp

Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2020). Disengagement , engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 957–983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09998-w

Blayone, T. J. B. (2014). A digital literacy framework : A four-dimensional analysis , and discussion of key findings (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30190.51520

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Diningrat, S. W. M., Nindya, M. A., & Salwa. (2020). Emergency online teaching: Early childhood education lecturers’ perception of barrier and pedagogical competency. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32304

Kowsalya, D., Venkat Lakshmi, H., & Suresh, K. (2012). Development and validation of a scale to assess self-concept in mild intellectually disabled children. International Journal Social Science & Education, 2(4), 699–709.

Mahmud, R. (2020). Blended learning model implementation in the normal, pandemic, and new normal era. Proceedings of the 5th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PFEIC 2020), 479, 130–139. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/pfeic-20/125945140

Mammino, L., & Zuin, V. (2015). Worldwide trends in green chemistry education. Royal Society of Chemistry.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Miller. (2003). Test validation: A literature review. University of Florida.

Monteiro, A. R., & Leite, C. (2021). Digital literacies in higher education : skills , uses , opportunities and obstacles to digital transformation. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(65), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6018/red.438721

Rahmi, R. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran di masa pandemi COVID-19. Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 30(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.24235/ath.v

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya. Parama Publishing.

Retnawati, Heri. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Parama Publishing.

Rosalina, E., Nasrullah, & Elyani, E. P. (2020). Teacher’s challenges towards online learning in pandemic era. Linguistic, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 10(2), 71–88.

Saxena, R., Bhat, V., & Jhingan, A. (2017). Leapfrogging to student at the core. In Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Issue November).

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada asesmen pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Ristiyana Puspita Sari, A., Sidauruk, S., Meiliawati, R. and Anggraeni, M.E. 2021. Development Of Digital Literacy Assessment Scale To Measure Student’s Digital Literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 12, 02 (Dec. 2021), 137-143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v12i02.128.

Most read articles by the same author(s)