Quality of Final Assessment Questions Made by Chemistry Subject Teachers in Class XI Senior High School in Kotawaringin Barat District in Odd Semester Academic Year 2018/2019

  • Yesi Gasela Palangka Raya University
  • Suandi Sidauruk Palangka Raya University
  • Abdul Hadjranul Fatah Palangka Raya University
Keywords: question quality, reliability, different power, difficulty level, distractor effectiveness

Abstract

The questions used in the Final Semester Assessment are teacher-made questions. This study aims to determine and describe the level of Quality of Final Semester Assessment Questions Made by Chemistry Subject Teachers in Class XI MIA Senior High School in Kotawaringin Barat District in Odd Semester Academic Year 2018/2019. This research is a descriptive study. The objects in this study were questions made by the teacher and students' answers from the Final Semester Assessment Chemistry subjects in class XI MIA High School A, class XI MIA High School B, class XI MIA High School C, and Class XI MIA High School D, in the odd semester of the year 2018/2019 teachings. The research data collection technique is the documentation method. Data analysis was performed by logical review and empirical review. The results showed that the results of the logical review analysis obtained the level of concordance with the basic competencies classified as good with a percentage of 86.67%. Judging from the aspects of material, construction, and language the level of appropriateness of the questions is good with a percentage of 85.63%. The distribution of Bloom's cognitive taxonomic domains is C1 at 22.67%, C2 at 43.33%, C3 at 34%, C4 at 0%, C5 at 0%, and C6 at 0%. The quality of the chemistry PAS questions for class XI MIA made by the teacher in terms of empirical review was obtained based on the different power index, difficulty index and distractor effectiveness. Empirical review, the number of questions with very good quality there are 35 (23.33%) questions, questions with good quality there are 55 (36.67%) questions, questions with not good quality there are 57 (38%) questions, and questions with the quality is not very good there are 3 (2%) questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yesi Gasela, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, FKIP, Palangka Raya University, Indonesia

Suandi Sidauruk, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, FKIP, Palangka Raya University, Indonesia

Abdul Hadjranul Fatah, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, FKIP, Palangka Raya University, Indonesia

References

Arifin, Zainal. 2014. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arifin, Zainal. 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. 2010. Juknis Analisis Butir Soal. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. 2017. Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Mansyur, dkk. 2015. Asesmen Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Marlina. 2018. Kualitas Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Buatan Guru Mata Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X MIA di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur pada Semester Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Skripsi Sarjana, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Palangka Raya.

Salvina, N., Sidauruk, S. and Asi, N.B. 2019. Kualitas Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Buatan Guru Mata Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X SMK Jurusan Teknologi Dan Rekayasa Di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Pada Semester Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 10, 1 (Jun. 2019), 46-56.

Peraturan Pemerintah. 2015. Peratutan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Secretariat Negara, Jakarta.

Prastoyo, Puji dan Safrida Nelly. 2017. Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Mata Pelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri 3 Medan tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 1.

Putra, Sitiatava Rizema. 2013. Desain Evaliasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.

Ratnawulan, Elis dan Rusdiana. 2015. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia. 2015. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2013. Penelitian Pendidikan Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Bandung: Kencana.

Sudaryono. 2014. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan Berdasarkan: Teori Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu.

Sudjana, Nana. 2014. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Rosda.

Sukardi, M. 2010. Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta Timur: Bumi Aksara.

Surapranata, Sumarna. 2009. Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: Rosda.

Susetyo, Budi. 2015. Prosedur Penyusunan & Analisis Tes. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Tjahjadarmawan, Elizabeth. 2018. Bernas Kimia HOTS. Yogyakarta: PaRama Ilmu.

Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2016. Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Winarno, M. E. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM PRESS).

Published
2020-03-17
How to Cite
[1]
Gasela, Y., Sidauruk, S. and Fatah, A.H. 2020. Quality of Final Assessment Questions Made by Chemistry Subject Teachers in Class XI Senior High School in Kotawaringin Barat District in Odd Semester Academic Year 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 11, 1 (Mar. 2020), 41-50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.72.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>