Analysis of Class X High School Chemistry Teaching Material On Stoichiometry Concepts

  • Siti Fatimah Indah Sari Palangka Raya University
  • Abdul Hadjranul Fatah Palangka Raya University
  • Maya Erliza Anggraeni Palangka Raya University
Keywords: analysis of teaching materials, textbooks, stoichiometry

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the teaching material in high school chemistry textbooks. The instruments used are micro-macro proposition identification tables, discourse macro structure models, and identification table propositions that have the potential for misconceptions (misconceptions). The data obtained were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the concept labels analyzed totaling 46 concept labels, the concept labels in textbook A and text book B that corresponded to the 2013 curriculum syllabus were 34 and 37 respectively. The concept labels found only in book A totaled 9 and all of them according to the 2013 curriculum syllabus, and the concept labels that are only found in book B, number 12 and all are in accordance with the 2013 Curriculum Syllabus. the concept at level 2 as the scope of discussion, in the text book B the material presentation on the elaboration dimension reaches level 4, and the progression dimension at level 2 there are 8 concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Siti Fatimah Indah Sari, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Palangka Raya University, Jl. H. Timang, UPR Campus in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Abdul Hadjranul Fatah, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Palangka Raya University, Jl. H. Timang, UPR Campus in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Maya Erliza Anggraeni, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Palangka Raya University, Jl. H. Timang, UPR Campus in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

References

Ahmad S. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Sekolah Terpadu. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publiaher.

Arifin.2008. Pembuatan Hyperteks Akademik pada Materi Kajian Kecepatan Reaksi dan Pemanfaatannya Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Kimia di SMA. Palangka Raya: Universitas Palangka Raya.

Berg. J Van Den and Meester R.W. J. 1991. Stability properties of a flow process in graphs. Journal Random Structures and Algorithms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice Vol. 8.

Dekdikbud. 2007. Model Penilaian Kelas. Jakarta: BSNP (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan).

Eriyanto. 2001. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Jogyakarta: Lkis.

Gagne, RM dan RJ Briggs. 1997. Condition of Learnig (Kondisi Belajar). New York: Holt Rinehard and Winston, Internasional Journal.

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., dan Tzougraki, C. 2011. Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Journal of The Royal Society of Chemistry, 12, 5-14.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Ella, L. K.1999. Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Phys. Educ, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304

Huddle, P. A. White, M.A. & Rogers, F. 2000. Using a Teaching Model to Correct Known Misconception in Electrochemitry. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol 77 (1): 104-110.

Majid Abdul, & Chaerul Rochman. 2014. Pendekatan Ilmiah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Meyasi, Yelli. 2016. Kesulitan Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Murung dan SMA Negeri Gunung Timang Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015 Dalam Memahami Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia. Skripsi Sarjana, tidak dierbitkan. Palangka Raya: Universitas Palangka Raya

Permendikbud. 2015. Peraturan menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar Oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta:BSNP.

Petrucci, R. H. 1985. Kimia Dasar Prinsip dan Terapan Modern Edisi Keempat Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Siregar, N. 1994. Studi Penenrapan Pedagogi Materi Subyek dalam Penulisan Buku Teks MIPA untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Intelektual Mahasiswa IKIP Bandung. Bandung: FMIPA IKIP.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih., dan Erliana S. 2012. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Kompetensi. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Sunarya, Y. 2000 . Kimia Dasar 1: Bedasarkan Prinsip-prinsip Kimia Terkini. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sunarya, Y. 2010 . Kimia Dasar 1: Bedasarkan Prinsip-prinsip Kimia Terkini. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Tekkaya, C. 2002. Misconceptions As Barrier To Understanding Biology. Hacettepe Onoversities Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 23, 259–266.

Tarigan, H Guntur. 1986. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tarigan, H. G. dan Taringan, D. 2009. Telaah Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wulandari, S.H., Fatah, A.H. and Anggraeni, M.E. 2019. Analisis Materi Ajar Kimia SMA/MA Kelas XII Pada Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 10, 2 (Des. 2019), 300-320.

Published
2020-03-29
How to Cite
[1]
Sari, S.F.I., Fatah, A.H. and Anggraeni, M.E. 2020. Analysis of Class X High School Chemistry Teaching Material On Stoichiometry Concepts. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 11, 1 (Mar. 2020), 139-151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.82.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>