Analysis of Atomic Structure Material in Class X High School Chemistry Textbooks

  • Syahra Ayu Pratiwi Palangka Raya University
  • Abdul Hadjranul Fatah Palangka Raya University
  • Syarpin Palangka Raya University
Keywords: analysis, textbooks, matter, atomic structure

Abstract

This research is a qualitative research. This research method is a descriptive research method. The research instrument used was the concept label identification table and the type of representation, the concept label conformity identification table with the syllabus, the discourse macro structure model, and the chemical representation criteria table. The results showed that the concept labels contained in book A were 27 concept labels and had 50 types of representations divided into macroscopic, submicroscopic, symbolic typologies. The concept labels contained in book B are 32 concept labels with 68 types of representations divided into macroscopic, submicroscopic, and symbolic typologies. The suitability of the concept textbook labels A and text book B to the 2013 curriculum curriculum chemistry there are 31 concept labels that correspond to the K-13 chemical syllabus. Book A's macro structure reaches level 7 of the elaboration dimension, and book B reaches level 7 of the elaboration dimension. The chemical representation criteria for the concept of atomic structure in book A have 21 representations, and in book B there are 26 representations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Syahra Ayu Pratiwi, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Abdul Hadjranul Fatah, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Syarpin, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

References

Arikunto, S., (2010). “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik”, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Chang, R. 2010. Chemistry 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005. Peraturan Pemerintah No.11 Tahun 2005 Tentang Buku Teks Pelajaran. Jakarta: BSNP.

Gilbert, J.K., & Treagust, D.F. 2008. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education: Models and Modeling in Science Education. Dorgrecht: Springer. Pp. 251-283.

Gilbert, J.K., & Treagust, D.F. 2009. Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education, dalam Gilbert dan Treagust (Eds). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education: Model and Modeling in Science Education. Dorgrecht: Springer.1-8.

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K dan Tzougraki, C. 2011. “Development and Application of Suitable Criteria for the Evaluation of Chemical Representations in School Textbooks”, Chemistry Education Research and Practice,12: 5-14.

Herron, J Dudley. 1977. Problem Associated with Concept Analysis. JS E, 61(2),185-199.

Huddle, P. A., White, M. A & Rogers, F. 2000. Using a Teaching Model to Correct Know Misconception in Electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol 77 (1): 104-110.

Johnstone, A. H. 1982. Macro-and Micro-Chemistry, School Science Review., 227, No. 64. P. 377-379.

Kean, Elizabeth dan Middlecamp, Catherine. 1985. A Survival Manual for General Chemistry (Paduan Belajar Kimia Dasar). Penerjemah: A. Hadyana Pudjaatmaka. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Muslich, Mansur. 2010. Text Book Writing. Jakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Nakhleh, M. 1992, Why Some Student Dont Learn Chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education.

Olayele. 2012. Enhancing Teachers‟ Knowledge for Using Multiple Representations in TeachingChemistry in Nigerian Senior Secondary Schools. Australia: Edith Cowan Universit.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasionl. 2007. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia No 41 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidkan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Sudarmo, U. (2013). Kimia Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sukardi. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sunyono. 2015. Pembelajaran Model Simayang Tipe II untuk Meningkatkan Model Mental dan Penguasaan Konsep. FKIP: Universitas Lampung.

Suyatinah. 2001. Analisis Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Sekolah Dasar Kelas II. Yogyakarta: Laporan Penelitian FIP-UNY.

Tarigan, H, Guntur. 1986. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Ketrampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tarigan, H, Guntur. 2009. Pengkajian Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Watoni, Abdul Haris. 2016, Kimia 1 Untuk Kelas X SMA dan MA. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Wulandari, S.H., Fatah, A.H. and Anggraeni, M.E. 2019. Analisis Materi Ajar Kimia SMA/MA Kelas XII Pada Konsep Sifat Koligatif Larutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 10, 2 (Dec. 2019), 300-320.

Zumdahl. (2007). Chemistry Sevent Edition. New York: Houghtn Mifflin Compani.

Published
2020-03-29
How to Cite
[1]
Pratiwi, S.A., Fatah, A.H. and Syarpin, S. 2020. Analysis of Atomic Structure Material in Class X High School Chemistry Textbooks. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 11, 1 (Mar. 2020), 132-138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.81.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>