Development of Multimedia Learning of Electrolyte and Non Electrolyte Solutions Based on Multiple Representations Using Lectora Inspire

  • Muhammad Iqbal Palangka Raya University
  • Abdul Hadjranul Fatah Palangka Raya University
  • Syarpin Palangka Raya University

Abstract

This study aims to determine the content and feasibility of Lectora Inspire learning multimedia based on multiple representations of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. This multimedia learning is a combination of text, images, animation, and video. This multimedia development learning based on multiple representations uses the Four-D (4D) model adapted from Thiagarajan. This development research only reaches three stages, namely define, design and develop. The data needed in this study is the suitability of concept label data with the 2013 curriculum syllabus, the suitability of learning multimedia content using the concept label checklist, narrative and typology as well as product test result data using student response questionnaires. The instruments used to obtain the data are the concept label identification table with the 2013 curriculum syllabus, the concept label identification table, narration and typology, the concept label conformity checklist, narrative and typology, and the response questionnaire. Product trials were conducted on the 2018 chemistry students to determine the feasibility of students for multimedia that had been developed. Multimedia learning based on multiple representations using lectora inspire consists of home pages, instructions for using multimedia, how to read navigation content and materials for electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. The contents of multimedia content on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution material consist of seven concept labels. The average individual product trial results are 93.2%. While the average product trial results in groups of 93.6%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Iqbal, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Abdul Hadjranul Fatah, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

Syarpin, Palangka Raya University

Chemistry Education Study Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education, FKIP, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia

References

Arikunto, S. 2008. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Anwar, Khairul., Sunyono, Nina Kadaritna. 2015. Pembelajaran Model Simayang Tipe II untuk Meningkatkan Model Mental dan Penguasaan Konsep. FKIP: Universitas Lampung.

Ardi, Ahmad Maulana. 2017. Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Representasi Kimia Pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 4 Kota Jambi. Universitas Jambi.

Amelia, Hanny. 2017. Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Menggunakan Lectora Inspire Pada Materi Ruang Lingkup Kimia Untuk Siswa Kelas X di SMAN 4 Kota Jambi. Universitas Jambi.

Asi, N.B. 2017. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Kimia Bahan Makanan Berbasis Web. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 8, 2 (Des. 2017), 163-170.

Chandrasegaran, L.A., Treaagust, D., & Mocerino, M. 2007. The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school student explain chemical reaction using multiple level of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8 (3), hlm. 293-307

Dahar, R. W. 2011. Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Davetak. 2013. Teachers Influence Students Motivation for Learning Science with Understanding. Eurasia Journal o f Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.

Fika, Rakhmalinda. 2017. Identifikasi Model Mental Berdasarkan Tiga Level Representasi Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Universitas Islan Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K, dan Tzougraki, C. 2010. “Development and Application of Suitable Criteria for the Evaluation of Chemical Representations in School Textbooks”, Chemistry Education Research and Practice,12, 5-14.

Gilbert, et al. 2008. Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Australia: Springer

Herron, J. Dudley., et. al. 1977. Problems Associated With Concept Analysis. Journal of Science Education, (61)2: 185 – 199.

Hariyanto, Suyono. 2011. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Ivers, K. S. & Ann E. B. 2002. Multimedia projects in education : designing, producing, and assessing. Second Edition. California : LIBRARIES UNLIMITED Teacher Ideas Press.

Lisa, Putri. 2018. Idenifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit di SMAN-4 Banda Aceh. Umiversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Ranry Darusalam Banda Aceh.

Munir. 2012. Multimedia konsep dan aplikasi dalam pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Mas’ud, Muhammad. 2014. Membuat Multimedia Pembelajaran dengan Lectora. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Shonif.

Mc Murry, John E. dan Fay, R obert C. 2016. Chemistry. (Ed. Seven).

Nur’aini, W. 2015. Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Materi Larutan Elektroli dan Non Elektrolit Kelas X IPA SMAN 9 Malang. FKIP:Universitas Negeri Malang

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia . 2005. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Rizqiyah, P. 2017. Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran (Lectora Inspire) Berbasis Multiple Level Representasi Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. UIN Walisongo Semarang.

Setyosari, Punaji. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Kencana Prenada Jakarta : Media Group.

Suyanti, R.D. 2010. Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sugiono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alabeta.

Sudjana, N. 2005. Metode Statistika Edisi Keenam. PT Tarsito: Bandung.

Thalanquer, V. 2011. Macro, Submicro and Simbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education. 33 (2). 179-195.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., and Semmel, M. I. 1974. Instruktional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. A Sourcebook. Indiana: Indiana University.

Vaugan, T. 2011. Multimedia: making it work. Eighth Edition. New York: Technology Education Mac Graw Hill.

Widyoko, Eko Putro. 2012. Tekhnik Penyusunan Instrumen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wiratmojo P dan Sasonohardjo.2002. Media Pembelajaran Bahan Ajar Diklat Kewidyaiswaraan Berjengjang Tingkat Pertamaa. Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Wu Hsin-kai, S Krajick and Solloway Eliot. 2000. Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Representation: Students Use of a Visualization Tool in Classroom. Paper. University of Michigan.

Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
[1]
Iqbal, M., Fatah, A.H. and Syarpin, S. 2020. Development of Multimedia Learning of Electrolyte and Non Electrolyte Solutions Based on Multiple Representations Using Lectora Inspire. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang. 11, 1 (Jun. 2020), 152-163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.83.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>